[WED]CHAPMAN and LEIGH

Tim Curtin wedmore@lists.tutton.org
Thu, 28 Mar 2002 14:45:10 +1100


This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_001C_01C1D667.296BF100
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Philip and Ann were not overly old! - one sees men aged 50 getting =
married for the first time and many many women over 30.

As for Sabra "aged 2" at baptism on 2 March 1795, I believe she was the =
daughter of Philip son of Philip and Ann, who by coincidence also =
married an Ann. Note that his son Joseph was baptised same day as Sabra =
and by implication newly born (since no age given in his case); if Ann =
Leigh Chapman was his mother she would indeed have been over 60!

Young Philip was bap. just a year after Philip sen and Ann Leigh =
married, on 9 May 1764. That he named his son Joseph bap 1795 after his =
grandfather Joseph and Uncle Joseph implies that he probably had a =
sister, your Sabra, born in 1779, after whom he named his daughter, born =
in 1793.

I hope this helps! - but perhaps there are Chapman wills that could shed =
more light?

Tim
  ----- Original Message -----=20
  From: Richard Hembury-Kellow=20
  To: wedmore@lists.tutton.org=20
  Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 7:59 AM
  Subject: [WED]CHAPMAN and LEIGH


  Is anyone else, perchance, researching the families of  Philip CHAPMAN =
and Ann LEIGH, who married at Wedmore on 6th September 1763?  I am =
having nightmares trying to resolve dates, parentage, etc., and am =
hoping that someone else may have been able to make greater sense of the =
available data than I have.
  =20
  The only Philip CHAPMAN I have found that may fit was baptised in =
1722, making him at least 41 when he married; as this seems slightly =
"mature" for a (presumably) first marriage, I'm a bit uncertain as to =
whether or not he is "my" Philip CHAPMAN.  His wife, Ann LEIGH (again =
assuming I've got the right one) was baptised in 1733, making her at =
least 33 when she married - again somewhat more "mature" than the norm.
  =20
  Their daughter, Sabra/Sebra CHAPMAN is described as being "age 2" at =
her baptism in 1793; this I have been able to prove wrong.  She was =
described as being aged 70 years at her death in 1849, so her newly =
calculated birth date of 1779 gives her a marriage age of 27/28.  With =
these figures, her mother Ann would have been about 46 when Sabra was =
born, much more believable than the previously projected age of 60!
  =20
  Many thanks for reading this - even more thanks will be available for =
resolving it!

------=_NextPart_000_001C_01C1D667.296BF100
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content=3D"text/html; charset=3Diso-8859-1" =
http-equiv=3DContent-Type>
<META content=3D"MSHTML 5.00.2614.3500" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Philip and Ann were not overly old! - =
one sees men=20
aged 50 getting married for the first time and many many women over=20
30.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>As for Sabra "aged 2" at baptism on 2 =
March 1795, I=20
believe she was the daughter of Philip son of Philip and Ann, who by =
coincidence=20
also married an Ann. Note that his son Joseph was baptised same day as =
Sabra and=20
by implication newly born (since no age given in his case); if Ann Leigh =
Chapman=20
was his mother she would indeed have been over 60!</FONT></DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Young Philip was bap. just a year after =
Philip sen=20
and Ann Leigh married, on 9 May 1764. That he named his&nbsp;son Joseph =
bap 1795=20
after his grandfather Joseph and Uncle Joseph implies that he probably =
had a=20
sister, your Sabra, born in 1779, after whom he named his daughter, born =
in=20
1793.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I hope this helps! - but perhaps there =
are Chapman=20
wills that could shed more light?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Tim</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE=20
style=3D"BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: =
0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-RIGHT: 0px">
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
  <DIV=20
  style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: =
black"><B>From:</B>=20
  <A href=3D"mailto:sue.avalon@btopenworld.com"=20
  title=3Dsue.avalon@btopenworld.com>Richard Hembury-Kellow</A> </DIV>
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A=20
  href=3D"mailto:wedmore@lists.tutton.org"=20
  title=3Dwedmore@lists.tutton.org>wedmore@lists.tutton.org</A> </DIV>
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Thursday, March 28, 2002 =
7:59=20
  AM</DIV>
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> [WED]CHAPMAN and =
LEIGH</DIV>
  <DIV><BR></DIV>
  <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Is anyone else, perchance, =
researching the=20
  families of&nbsp; Philip CHAPMAN and Ann LEIGH, who married at Wedmore =
on 6th=20
  September 1763?&nbsp; I am having nightmares trying to resolve dates,=20
  parentage, etc., and am hoping that someone else may have been able to =
make=20
  greater sense of the available data than I have.</FONT></DIV>
  <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
  <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>The only Philip CHAPMAN I have found =
that may fit=20
  was baptised in 1722, making him at least 41 when he married; as this =
seems=20
  slightly "mature" for a (presumably) first marriage, I'm a bit =
uncertain as to=20
  whether or not he is "my" Philip CHAPMAN.&nbsp; His wife, Ann LEIGH =
(again=20
  assuming I've got the right one) was baptised in 1733, making her at =
least 33=20
  when she married - again somewhat more "mature" than the =
norm.</FONT></DIV>
  <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
  <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Their daughter, Sabra/Sebra CHAPMAN =
is described=20
  as being "age 2" at her baptism in 1793; this I have been able to =
prove=20
  wrong.&nbsp; She was described as being aged 70 years at her death in =
1849, so=20
  her newly calculated birth date of 1779 gives her a marriage age of=20
  27/28.&nbsp; With these figures, her mother Ann would have been about =
46 when=20
  Sabra was born, much more believable than the previously projected age =

  of&nbsp;60!</FONT></DIV>
  <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
  <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Many thanks for reading this - even =
more thanks=20
  will be available for resolving =
it!</FONT></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>

------=_NextPart_000_001C_01C1D667.296BF100--