From mathew.ducket1@btopenworld.com Thu Aug 2 08:49:34 2007 From: mathew.ducket1@btopenworld.com (Mathew Duckett) Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 08:49:34 +0100 Subject: [WED]Duckett, Banwell Message-ID: <000201c7d4d9$f180f2a0$28048351@duckett> This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0007_01C7D4E2.0C977B60 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I recently received the following note from a colleague and can't put it = into any context. "At a farm sale near Cheddar in 1988, I saw a Bible with the = inscription;=20 'Eliza Banwell. The Wedding gift of her sister Eleanor Duckett. April 5 = 1877' ". I have five Eleanor Ducketts three by birth and two by marriage they are = all comparatively close relatives and none fit the above. I think the names Banwell and Duckett may both be married names rather = than maiden names. Can anyone shed any light on this? Matthew. ------=_NextPart_000_0007_01C7D4E2.0C977B60 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I recently received the following note = from a=20 colleague and can't put it into any context.

"At a farm sale near Cheddar in 1988, I = saw a Bible=20 with the inscription;

'Eliza=20 Banwell. The Wedding gift of her sister Eleanor Duckett. April 5 1877'=20 ".

I have five Eleanor Ducketts three by = birth and two=20 by marriage they are all comparatively close relatives and none fit the=20 above.

I think the names Banwell and = Duckett may both=20 be married names rather than maiden names. Can anyone shed any = light on=20 this?

Matthew.

------=_NextPart_000_0007_01C7D4E2.0C977B60-- From lnunn@bigpond.net.au Thu Aug 2 09:28:12 2007 From: lnunn@bigpond.net.au (Lyn Nunn) Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 18:28:12 +1000 Subject: [WED]Duckett, Banwell Message-ID: <01a501c7d4df$1078dba0$f531ae3a@enterpriseb> This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_01A1_01C7D532.E2010FF0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_001_01A2_01C7D532.E2010FF0" ------=_NextPart_001_01A2_01C7D532.E2010FF0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Matthew How about this one from FreeBDM Marriages Jun 1877 (>99%)=20 -------------------------------------------------------------------------= ------- Arney Edward Axbridge 5c891 BANWELL Eliza Axbridge 5c891=20 regards Lyn in Oz ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Mathew Duckett=20 To: Wedmore lists=20 Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2007 5:49 PM Subject: [WED]Duckett, Banwell I recently received the following note from a colleague and can't put = it into any context. "At a farm sale near Cheddar in 1988, I saw a Bible with the = inscription;=20 'Eliza Banwell. The Wedding gift of her sister Eleanor Duckett. April = 5 1877' ". I have five Eleanor Ducketts three by birth and two by marriage they = are all comparatively close relatives and none fit the above. I think the names Banwell and Duckett may both be married names rather = than maiden names. Can anyone shed any light on this? Matthew. ------=_NextPart_001_01A2_01C7D532.E2010FF0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi=20 Matthew

How = about this one=20 from FreeBDM

Marriages Jun = 1877 (>99%)=20

Arney Edward&nbs= p; Axbridge 5c891<= TD> BANWELL Eliza&nb= sp;=20 Axbridge 5c891<= TD>

regards

Lyn

in=20 Oz

----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Mathew Duckett =
To: Wedmore lists

Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2007 = 5:49=20 PM

Subject: [WED]Duckett, = Banwell

I recently received the following = note from a=20 colleague and can't put it into any context.

"At a farm sale near Cheddar in 1988, = I saw a=20 Bible with the inscription;

'Eliza=20 Banwell. The Wedding gift of her sister Eleanor Duckett. April 5 1877' = ".

I have five Eleanor Ducketts three by = birth and=20 two by marriage they are all comparatively close relatives and none = fit the=20 above.

I think the names Banwell and = Duckett may=20 both be married names rather than maiden names. Can anyone shed = any light=20 on this?

Matthew.

------=_NextPart_001_01A2_01C7D532.E2010FF0-- ------=_NextPart_000_01A1_01C7D532.E2010FF0 Content-Type: image/gif; name="btnInfo.gif" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Location: http://freebmd.rootsweb.com/btnInfo.gif R0lGODlhHQAQAPcAAAAAAP////8LDP8XGP8bHP5DRP9JSv9QU/9gYf9hYv9jZP9oaf96ff+Oj/+P kP+Sk/+bnP+oqf+pqv+srf/Jyv/Ky//T1P+doP+4uv/V1//Bxv/Cy//M1P/S2v/d5f/f0f/Syv+q nf+0rP/Pyv8yHf8zIP9LOf/a1/40Jv9GOv9XTv+Igv/DwP/EwP/T0P8fF/8rJf4xJ/9RSv9taf+9 uv/Lyf8CAP8CAv8DA/8FBf8GBf8JB/8MCP8NDP8SEf8TE/8YGP8fHf8hIP8jIf8jI/8kJP8lJf8m Jf8rKv8tK/8tLf8zMv81Nf82Nv84OP87O/9AQP1DQf9DQ/xDQv9GRf9HRv9JSf9MS/9MTP9PTv9U VP9WVv9bWv9iYv9kYv9kZP9nZv9oaP1nZ/9paf9ubP9vb/9zcf97ev99fP+Ghv+JiP+Kiv+Rkf+U kv+UlP+Xlf+Zl/6Xl/+Zmf+enf6cnP+fn/+iov+np/+vr/+xsP+zs/+3t/+5uP66uv+9vf/Hx//I yP/R0f/V1f/a2v/b2//c3P/l5f/p6f///wAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAACH5BAEAAIgALAAAAAAdABAA AAj/ABEJ9PAhBB8PHjII2qDBBSAKhAZZqEMHD58JF9YIFPhGjaEKC9xw0MACQwQ8fvTsAXGighw7 EvaIOHNAARtEeNSQCcCzp8+fQHnqwQIhTwWehZIG5dnn0NIASbj88cOTyo0jcYJuseo0aIIxI1r0 pJJmqZM7XYNqyVKDxtg0W7bECeOkT4AtN7bcCXCIyhEqPgsgCVRjbJg+eO+kORKgz1meN8JQ2EKg 5xQmI0C8vVu2T+UAj+846UlgbwAxZuCg2Uw2AJ/Pj+MA5nnE9BgFc1ZXLbulLAXYeyncoND4Rtcu RDJ04Bnmxg0nzuP0sXGk+Y2ycW4QuGE6AJguDxg8Vx1PyGcDJFcaWDEyvn0AL0V+IEojBYcAID56 BBmyY0mVFWUkgQQUUByhggkxkFDCCwMAYYBAUiiRxAs82PBEEzkIkQYibXwRhUA6zCADCil4AQMC DggUEAA7 ------=_NextPart_000_01A1_01C7D532.E2010FF0 Content-Type: image/gif; name="scanavail.gif" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Location: http://freebmd.rootsweb.com/scanavail.gif R0lGODlhIAAOAMQAAAAAAP///zQyQkxqjG6ZwZWyxqvJ3dPp9+Xy+vj598zMy/v05vrs1vDXtdCz kZWSj3lcQv///wAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAACH5BAEA ABEALAAAAAAgAA4AAAV1YCSOZGmeaOk8T0ourOHCROQMri0YC1SgDJ+oV0M5BAcRQ3AK/kYQ3OmY VCJLQRlJaKKSllUlRBtZKBTGq8u5HTykJG/uISiwWPWG4M6CqHM3Lzt6YREQRTkRS2R6ZYcjhImQ PgpHWno1cpJDdyUwLJuhoiIhADs= ------=_NextPart_000_01A1_01C7D532.E2010FF0-- From tcurtin@bigblue.net.au Sat Aug 4 02:33:37 2007 From: tcurtin@bigblue.net.au (Tim Curtin) Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2007 11:33:37 +1000 Subject: [WED]Duckett-Banwell sisters References: <20070803050408.279C062270@mailman.siteprotect.com> Message-ID: <000601c7d637$7e9e7e10$0200a8c0@TCHOME> Dear all Which Eleanor Green married Robert Duckett? If it was the daughter of John and Nancy (nee Stone) Green of Panboro who was baptised on 24 Nov 1814, she had a sister Elizabeth baptised the same day (and another sister Maria Tyley Green also baptised that day). Regards Tim www.timcurtin.com ----- Original Message ----- From: To: Sent: Friday, August 03, 2007 3:04 PM Subject: Wedmore digest, Vol 1 #601 - 2 msgs > Send Wedmore mailing list submissions to > wedmore@lists.tutton.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://lists.tutton.org/mailman/listinfo/wedmore > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > wedmore-request@lists.tutton.org > > You can reach the person managing the list at > wedmore-admin@lists.tutton.org > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of Wedmore digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Duckett, Banwell (Mathew Duckett) > 2. Re: Duckett, Banwell (Lyn Nunn) > > --__--__-- > > Message: 1 > From: "Mathew Duckett" > To: "Wedmore lists" > Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 08:49:34 +0100 > Subject: [WED]Duckett, Banwell > > This is a multi-part message in MIME format. > > ------=_NextPart_000_0007_01C7D4E2.0C977B60 > Content-Type: text/plain; > charset="iso-8859-1" > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > I recently received the following note from a colleague and can't put it = > into any context. > > "At a farm sale near Cheddar in 1988, I saw a Bible with the = > inscription;=20 > 'Eliza Banwell. The Wedding gift of her sister Eleanor Duckett. April 5 = > 1877' ". > > I have five Eleanor Ducketts three by birth and two by marriage they are = > all comparatively close relatives and none fit the above. > I think the names Banwell and Duckett may both be married names rather = > than maiden names. Can anyone shed any light on this? > Matthew. > ------=_NextPart_000_0007_01C7D4E2.0C977B60 > Content-Type: text/html; > charset="iso-8859-1" > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > > > charset=3Diso-8859-1"> > > > > >

I recently received the following note = > from a=20 > colleague and can't put it into any context.

"At a farm sale near Cheddar in 1988, I = > saw a Bible=20 > with the inscription;

size=3D2>'Eliza=20 > Banwell. The Wedding gift of her sister Eleanor Duckett. April 5 1877'=20 > ".

I have five Eleanor Ducketts three by = > birth and two=20 > by marriage they are all comparatively close relatives and none fit the=20 > above.

I think the names Banwell and = > Duckett may both=20 > be married names rather than maiden names. Can anyone shed any = > light on=20 > this?

Matthew.

> > ------=_NextPart_000_0007_01C7D4E2.0C977B60-- > > > --__--__-- > > Message: 2 > From: "Lyn Nunn" > To: "wedmore list" > Subject: Re: [WED]Duckett, Banwell > Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 18:28:12 +1000 > > This is a multi-part message in MIME format. > > ------=_NextPart_000_01A1_01C7D532.E2010FF0 > Content-Type: multipart/alternative; > boundary="----=_NextPart_001_01A2_01C7D532.E2010FF0" > > > ------=_NextPart_001_01A2_01C7D532.E2010FF0 > Content-Type: text/plain; > charset="iso-8859-1" > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > Hi Matthew > > How about this one from FreeBDM > > Marriages Jun 1877 (>99%)=20 > -------------------------------------------------------------------------= > ------- > Arney Edward Axbridge 5c891 BANWELL Eliza Axbridge 5c891=20 > > regards > > Lyn > in Oz > ----- Original Message -----=20 > From: Mathew Duckett=20 > To: Wedmore lists=20 > Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2007 5:49 PM > Subject: [WED]Duckett, Banwell > > > I recently received the following note from a colleague and can't put = > it into any context. > > "At a farm sale near Cheddar in 1988, I saw a Bible with the = > inscription;=20 > 'Eliza Banwell. The Wedding gift of her sister Eleanor Duckett. April = > 5 1877' ". > > I have five Eleanor Ducketts three by birth and two by marriage they = > are all comparatively close relatives and none fit the above. > I think the names Banwell and Duckett may both be married names rather = > than maiden names. Can anyone shed any light on this? > Matthew. > ------=_NextPart_001_01A2_01C7D532.E2010FF0 > Content-Type: text/html; > charset="iso-8859-1" > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > > > charset=3Diso-8859-1"> > > > > >

Hi=20 > Matthew

color=3D#000080>

How = > about this one=20 > from FreeBDM

color=3D#000080>

Marriages Jun = > 1877 size=3D-2>(>99%)=20 >

> bgcolor=3D"#99cc99">Arney Edward&nbs= > p; href=3D'javascript:golink("/cgi/districts.pl?r=3D57802050&d=3Dbmd_118= > 4743028")'>Axbridge 5c href=3D"http://freebmd.rootsweb.com/cgi/search.pl?vol=3D5c&pgno=3D891= > &type=3DMarriages&start=3D1877&sq=3D2&end=3D1877&eq=3D= > 2&v=3DMTE4NjA0MzA1Njo4MTdmNDcwODg5ZWJhZDUwNTU5ZTg5ZDE4MWFjZDc1N2I0OTQ= > xMjA3&jsexec=3D1&mono=3D0&action=3DFind">891<= > TD> href=3D'javascript:golink("/cgi/information.pl?r=3D57802050&d=3Dbmd_1= > 184743028")'> onclick=3D'pressed(this,"/btnInfoP.gif")'=20 > src=3D"http://freebmd.rootsweb.com/btnInfo.gif" border=3D0 = > name=3Dinfo1> href=3D'javascript:golink("http://www7.freebmd.org.uk/cgi/information.pl?= > r=3D57802050&d=3Dbmd_1184743028&scan=3D1")'> alt=3D"Scan available - click to view"=20 > src=3D"http://freebmd.rootsweb.com/scanavail.gif" = > border=3D0> bgcolor=3D"#ccffcc">BANWELL Eliza&nb= > sp;=20 > href=3D'javascript:golink("/cgi/districts.pl?r=3D57804286&d=3Dbmd_118= > 4743028")'>Axbridge 5c href=3D"http://freebmd.rootsweb.com/cgi/search.pl?vol=3D5c&pgno=3D891= > &type=3DMarriages&start=3D1877&sq=3D2&end=3D1877&eq=3D= > 2&v=3DMTE4NjA0MzA1Njo4MTdmNDcwODg5ZWJhZDUwNTU5ZTg5ZDE4MWFjZDc1N2I0OTQ= > xMjA3&jsexec=3D1&mono=3D0&action=3DFind">891<= > TD>

color=3D#000080>

color=3D#000080>regards

color=3D#000080>

color=3D#000080>Lyn

in=20 > Oz

style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; = > BORDER-LEFT: #000080 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px"> >
----- Original Message -----
> style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: = > black">From:=20 > href=3D"mailto:mathew.ducket1@btopenworld.com">Mathew Duckett = > >
To: title=3Dwedmore@lists.tutton.org=20 > href=3D"mailto:wedmore@lists.tutton.org">Wedmore lists
>
Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2007 = > 5:49=20 > PM
>
Subject: [WED]Duckett, = > Banwell
>

>
I recently received the following = > note from a=20 > colleague and can't put it into any context.
>

>
"At a farm sale near Cheddar in 1988, = > I saw a=20 > Bible with the inscription;
>
size=3D2>'Eliza=20 > Banwell. The Wedding gift of her sister Eleanor Duckett. April 5 1877' = > > ".
>

>
I have five Eleanor Ducketts three by = > birth and=20 > two by marriage they are all comparatively close relatives and none = > fit the=20 > above.
>
I think the names Banwell and = > Duckett may=20 > both be married names rather than maiden names. Can anyone shed = > any light=20 > on this?
>
size=3D2>Matthew.

> > ------=_NextPart_001_01A2_01C7D532.E2010FF0-- > > ------=_NextPart_000_01A1_01C7D532.E2010FF0 > Content-Type: image/gif; > name="btnInfo.gif" > Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 > Content-Location: http://freebmd.rootsweb.com/btnInfo.gif > > R0lGODlhHQAQAPcAAAAAAP////8LDP8XGP8bHP5DRP9JSv9QU/9gYf9hYv9jZP9oaf96ff+Oj/+P > kP+Sk/+bnP+oqf+pqv+srf/Jyv/Ky//T1P+doP+4uv/V1//Bxv/Cy//M1P/S2v/d5f/f0f/Syv+q > nf+0rP/Pyv8yHf8zIP9LOf/a1/40Jv9GOv9XTv+Igv/DwP/EwP/T0P8fF/8rJf4xJ/9RSv9taf+9 > uv/Lyf8CAP8CAv8DA/8FBf8GBf8JB/8MCP8NDP8SEf8TE/8YGP8fHf8hIP8jIf8jI/8kJP8lJf8m > Jf8rKv8tK/8tLf8zMv81Nf82Nv84OP87O/9AQP1DQf9DQ/xDQv9GRf9HRv9JSf9MS/9MTP9PTv9U > VP9WVv9bWv9iYv9kYv9kZP9nZv9oaP1nZ/9paf9ubP9vb/9zcf97ev99fP+Ghv+JiP+Kiv+Rkf+U > kv+UlP+Xlf+Zl/6Xl/+Zmf+enf6cnP+fn/+iov+np/+vr/+xsP+zs/+3t/+5uP66uv+9vf/Hx//I > yP/R0f/V1f/a2v/b2//c3P/l5f/p6f///wAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA > AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA > AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA > AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA > AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA > AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA > AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAACH5BAEAAIgALAAAAAAdABAA > AAj/ABEJ9PAhBB8PHjII2qDBBSAKhAZZqEMHD58JF9YIFPhGjaEKC9xw0MACQwQ8fvTsAXGighw7 > EvaIOHNAARtEeNSQCcCzp8+fQHnqwQIhTwWehZIG5dnn0NIASbj88cOTyo0jcYJuseo0aIIxI1r0 > pJJmqZM7XYNqyVKDxtg0W7bECeOkT4AtN7bcCXCIyhEqPgsgCVRjbJg+eO+kORKgz1meN8JQ2EKg > 5xQmI0C8vVu2T+UAj+846UlgbwAxZuCg2Uw2AJ/Pj+MA5nnE9BgFc1ZXLbulLAXYeyncoND4Rtcu > RDJ04Bnmxg0nzuP0sXGk+Y2ycW4QuGE6AJguDxg8Vx1PyGcDJFcaWDEyvn0AL0V+IEojBYcAID56 > BBmyY0mVFWUkgQQUUByhggkxkFDCCwMAYYBAUiiRxAs82PBEEzkIkQYibXwRhUA6zCADCil4AQMC > DggUEAA7 > > ------=_NextPart_000_01A1_01C7D532.E2010FF0 > Content-Type: image/gif; > name="scanavail.gif" > Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 > Content-Location: http://freebmd.rootsweb.com/scanavail.gif > > R0lGODlhIAAOAMQAAAAAAP///zQyQkxqjG6ZwZWyxqvJ3dPp9+Xy+vj598zMy/v05vrs1vDXtdCz > kZWSj3lcQv///wAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAACH5BAEA > ABEALAAAAAAgAA4AAAV1YCSOZGmeaOk8T0ourOHCROQMri0YC1SgDJ+oV0M5BAcRQ3AK/kYQ3OmY > VCJLQRlJaKKSllUlRBtZKBTGq8u5HTykJG/uISiwWPWG4M6CqHM3Lzt6YREQRTkRS2R6ZYcjhImQ > PgpHWno1cpJDdyUwLJuhoiIhADs= > > ------=_NextPart_000_01A1_01C7D532.E2010FF0-- > > > > --__--__-- > > _______________________________________________ > Wedmore mailing list > Wedmore@lists.tutton.org > http://lists.tutton.org/mailman/listinfo/wedmore > > Wedmore Web Site at: http://www.tutton.org > > > End of Wedmore Digest > From tcurtin@bigblue.net.au Sat Aug 4 08:30:29 2007 From: tcurtin@bigblue.net.au (Tim Curtin) Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2007 17:30:29 +1000 Subject: [WED]Duckett-Banwell again References: <20070803050408.279C062270@mailman.siteprotect.com> Message-ID: <000601c7d669$572e9810$0200a8c0@TCHOME> I see from the age given in the 1851 Census that in fact it was the younger Eleanor Green (bp. 2 Jan 1826) who married Robert Duckett. Apologies, and the mystery remains! Tim www.timcurtin.com ----- Original Message ----- From: To: Sent: Friday, August 03, 2007 3:04 PM Subject: Wedmore digest, Vol 1 #601 - 2 msgs > Send Wedmore mailing list submissions to > wedmore@lists.tutton.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://lists.tutton.org/mailman/listinfo/wedmore > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > wedmore-request@lists.tutton.org > > You can reach the person managing the list at > wedmore-admin@lists.tutton.org > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of Wedmore digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Duckett, Banwell (Mathew Duckett) > 2. Re: Duckett, Banwell (Lyn Nunn) > > --__--__-- > > Message: 1 > From: "Mathew Duckett" > To: "Wedmore lists" > Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 08:49:34 +0100 > Subject: [WED]Duckett, Banwell > > This is a multi-part message in MIME format. > > ------=_NextPart_000_0007_01C7D4E2.0C977B60 > Content-Type: text/plain; > charset="iso-8859-1" > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > I recently received the following note from a colleague and can't put it = > into any context. > > "At a farm sale near Cheddar in 1988, I saw a Bible with the = > inscription;=20 > 'Eliza Banwell. The Wedding gift of her sister Eleanor Duckett. April 5 = > 1877' ". > > I have five Eleanor Ducketts three by birth and two by marriage they are = > all comparatively close relatives and none fit the above. > I think the names Banwell and Duckett may both be married names rather = > than maiden names. Can anyone shed any light on this? > Matthew. > ------=_NextPart_000_0007_01C7D4E2.0C977B60 > Content-Type: text/html; > charset="iso-8859-1" > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > > > charset=3Diso-8859-1"> > > > > >

I recently received the following note = > from a=20 > colleague and can't put it into any context.

"At a farm sale near Cheddar in 1988, I = > saw a Bible=20 > with the inscription;

size=3D2>'Eliza=20 > Banwell. The Wedding gift of her sister Eleanor Duckett. April 5 1877'=20 > ".

I have five Eleanor Ducketts three by = > birth and two=20 > by marriage they are all comparatively close relatives and none fit the=20 > above.

I think the names Banwell and = > Duckett may both=20 > be married names rather than maiden names. Can anyone shed any = > light on=20 > this?

Matthew.

Hi=20 > Matthew

color=3D#000080>

How = > about this one=20 > from FreeBDM

color=3D#000080>

Marriages Jun = > 1877 size=3D-2>(>99%)=20 >

color=3D#000080>

color=3D#000080>regards

color=3D#000080>

color=3D#000080>Lyn

in=20 > Oz

style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; = > BORDER-LEFT: #000080 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px"> >
----- Original Message -----
> style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: = > black">From:=20 > href=3D"mailto:mathew.ducket1@btopenworld.com">Mathew Duckett = > >
To: title=3Dwedmore@lists.tutton.org=20 > href=3D"mailto:wedmore@lists.tutton.org">Wedmore lists
>
Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2007 = > 5:49=20 > PM
>
Subject: [WED]Duckett, = > Banwell
>

>
I recently received the following = > note from a=20 > colleague and can't put it into any context.
>

>
"At a farm sale near Cheddar in 1988, = > I saw a=20 > Bible with the inscription;
>
size=3D2>'Eliza=20 > Banwell. The Wedding gift of her sister Eleanor Duckett. April 5 1877' = > > ".
>

>
I have five Eleanor Ducketts three by = > birth and=20 > two by marriage they are all comparatively close relatives and none = > fit the=20 > above.
>
I think the names Banwell and = > Duckett may=20 > both be married names rather than maiden names. Can anyone shed = > any light=20 > on this?
>
size=3D2>Matthew.

> > ------=_NextPart_001_01A2_01C7D532.E2010FF0-- > > ------=_NextPart_000_01A1_01C7D532.E2010FF0 > Content-Type: image/gif; > name="btnInfo.gif" > Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 > Content-Location: http://freebmd.rootsweb.com/btnInfo.gif > > R0lGODlhHQAQAPcAAAAAAP////8LDP8XGP8bHP5DRP9JSv9QU/9gYf9hYv9jZP9oaf96ff+Oj/+P > kP+Sk/+bnP+oqf+pqv+srf/Jyv/Ky//T1P+doP+4uv/V1//Bxv/Cy//M1P/S2v/d5f/f0f/Syv+q > nf+0rP/Pyv8yHf8zIP9LOf/a1/40Jv9GOv9XTv+Igv/DwP/EwP/T0P8fF/8rJf4xJ/9RSv9taf+9 > uv/Lyf8CAP8CAv8DA/8FBf8GBf8JB/8MCP8NDP8SEf8TE/8YGP8fHf8hIP8jIf8jI/8kJP8lJf8m > Jf8rKv8tK/8tLf8zMv81Nf82Nv84OP87O/9AQP1DQf9DQ/xDQv9GRf9HRv9JSf9MS/9MTP9PTv9U > VP9WVv9bWv9iYv9kYv9kZP9nZv9oaP1nZ/9paf9ubP9vb/9zcf97ev99fP+Ghv+JiP+Kiv+Rkf+U > kv+UlP+Xlf+Zl/6Xl/+Zmf+enf6cnP+fn/+iov+np/+vr/+xsP+zs/+3t/+5uP66uv+9vf/Hx//I > yP/R0f/V1f/a2v/b2//c3P/l5f/p6f///wAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA > AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA > AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA > AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA > AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA > AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA > AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAACH5BAEAAIgALAAAAAAdABAA > AAj/ABEJ9PAhBB8PHjII2qDBBSAKhAZZqEMHD58JF9YIFPhGjaEKC9xw0MACQwQ8fvTsAXGighw7 > EvaIOHNAARtEeNSQCcCzp8+fQHnqwQIhTwWehZIG5dnn0NIASbj88cOTyo0jcYJuseo0aIIxI1r0 > pJJmqZM7XYNqyVKDxtg0W7bECeOkT4AtN7bcCXCIyhEqPgsgCVRjbJg+eO+kORKgz1meN8JQ2EKg > 5xQmI0C8vVu2T+UAj+846UlgbwAxZuCg2Uw2AJ/Pj+MA5nnE9BgFc1ZXLbulLAXYeyncoND4Rtcu > RDJ04Bnmxg0nzuP0sXGk+Y2ycW4QuGE6AJguDxg8Vx1PyGcDJFcaWDEyvn0AL0V+IEojBYcAID56 > BBmyY0mVFWUkgQQUUByhggkxkFDCCwMAYYBAUiiRxAs82PBEEzkIkQYibXwRhUA6zCADCil4AQMC > DggUEAA7 > > ------=_NextPart_000_01A1_01C7D532.E2010FF0 > Content-Type: image/gif; > name="scanavail.gif" > Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 > Content-Location: http://freebmd.rootsweb.com/scanavail.gif > > R0lGODlhIAAOAMQAAAAAAP///zQyQkxqjG6ZwZWyxqvJ3dPp9+Xy+vj598zMy/v05vrs1vDXtdCz > kZWSj3lcQv///wAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAACH5BAEA > ABEALAAAAAAgAA4AAAV1YCSOZGmeaOk8T0ourOHCROQMri0YC1SgDJ+oV0M5BAcRQ3AK/kYQ3OmY > VCJLQRlJaKKSllUlRBtZKBTGq8u5HTykJG/uISiwWPWG4M6CqHM3Lzt6YREQRTkRS2R6ZYcjhImQ > PgpHWno1cpJDdyUwLJuhoiIhADs= > > ------=_NextPart_000_01A1_01C7D532.E2010FF0-- > > > > --__--__-- > > _______________________________________________ > Wedmore mailing list > Wedmore@lists.tutton.org > http://lists.tutton.org/mailman/listinfo/wedmore > > Wedmore Web Site at: http://www.tutton.org > > > End of Wedmore Digest > From omfraser@iprimus.com.au Sat Aug 11 01:11:27 2007 From: omfraser@iprimus.com.au (olga fraser) Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 10:11:27 +1000 Subject: [WED]Robert duckett & Eleanor Green Message-ID: <000601c7dbac$2930cb70$a900a8c0@homegmr9djuo2u> This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0003_01C7DBFF.FA9216D0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Would someone be able to supply the birth dates and baptisms of the 12 = children of Robert Duckett b 1818 and ELeanor Green b 1826 who married = in 1847. Also their children that died young and their burial dates. = Where Robert and Eleanor were married in 1847 and the date married. Thanks very much Olga ------=_NextPart_000_0003_01C7DBFF.FA9216D0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Would someone be able to supply the = birth=20 dates and baptisms of the 12 children of Robert Duckett b 1818 = and=20 ELeanor Green b 1826 who married in 1847. Also their children that = died=20 young and their burial dates. Where Robert and Eleanor were = married in=20 1847 and the date married.

Thanks very much = Olga

------=_NextPart_000_0003_01C7DBFF.FA9216D0-- From omfraser@iprimus.com.au Sat Aug 11 01:13:37 2007 From: omfraser@iprimus.com.au (olga fraser) Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 10:13:37 +1000 Subject: [WED]re William Tyley born 1834 Message-ID: <000601c7dbac$772d16d0$a900a8c0@homegmr9djuo2u> This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0003_01C7DC00.489789F0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Would someone know the surname of Sarah his wife who was born in 1831 in = Wedmore. There is a marriage listed for William Tyley in Axbridge in = 1858 on page 4c page 1070 but no Sarah is listed on this page. Thanks = very much. Olga ------=_NextPart_000_0003_01C7DC00.489789F0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Would someone know the surname of Sarah = his wife=20 who was born in 1831 in Wedmore. There is a marriage listed for William = Tyley in=20 Axbridge in 1858 on page 4c page 1070 but no Sarah is listed on this = page.=20 Thanks very much. Olga

------=_NextPart_000_0003_01C7DC00.489789F0-- From susan@avalon1999.fsnet.co.uk Sat Aug 11 01:46:36 2007 From: susan@avalon1999.fsnet.co.uk (Susan Hembury-Kellow) Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 01:46:36 +0100 Subject: [WED]re William Tyley born 1834 In-Reply-To: <000601c7dbac$772d16d0$a900a8c0@homegmr9djuo2u> Message-ID: <20070811004646.122301C00081@mwinf3404.me.freeserve.com> This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_019D_01C7DBB9.7487D480 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello Olga, I had a look through the likely baptisms, and by a process of elimination (!) eventually discovered that she was Sarah TUCKER (married June Qtr 1858, Axbridge District, Vol 5c, Page 1070). Sarah TUCKER was baptised on 12 May 1831, Wedmore, daughter of Charles & Hannah, Wedmore, Farmer. Hope this helps! Best wishes, Sue _____ From: wedmore-admin@lists.tutton.org [mailto:wedmore-admin@lists.tutton.org] On Behalf Of olga fraser Sent: 11 August 2007 01:14 To: wedmore@lists.tutton.org Subject: [WED]re William Tyley born 1834 Would someone know the surname of Sarah his wife who was born in 1831 in Wedmore. There is a marriage listed for William Tyley in Axbridge in 1858 on page 4c page 1070 but no Sarah is listed on this page. Thanks very much. Olga ------=_NextPart_000_019D_01C7DBB9.7487D480 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hello Olga, =

I had a look through the likely = baptisms, and by a process of elimination (!) eventually discovered that she was = Sarah TUCKER (married June Qtr 1858, Axbridge District, Vol 5c, Page = 1070).

Sarah TUCKER was baptised on 12 May = 1831, Wedmore, daughter of Charles & Hannah, Wedmore, = Farmer.

Hope this = helps!

Best wishes, =

Sue

From: wedmore-admin@lists.tutton.org [mailto:wedmore-admin@lists.tutton.org] = On Behalf Of olga fraser
Sent: 11 August 2007 = 01:14
To: = wedmore@lists.tutton.org
Subject: [WED]re William = Tyley born 1834

Would someone know the surname of Sarah his wife who = was born in 1831 in Wedmore. There is a marriage listed for William Tyley in Axbridge in 1858 on page 4c page 1070 but no Sarah is listed on this = page. Thanks very much. Olga

------=_NextPart_000_019D_01C7DBB9.7487D480-- From Clare.Noyce@emcoruk.com Sat Aug 11 10:00:54 2007 From: Clare.Noyce@emcoruk.com (Clare.Noyce@emcoruk.com) Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 10:00:54 +0100 Subject: [WED]Clare Noyce/EFSL/UK/EMCORGROUP is out of the office. Message-ID: I will be out of the office starting 09/08/2007 and will not return until 13/08/2007. I will respond to your message when I return ______________________________________________ Clare Noyce Procurement Co-Ordinator EMCOR Facilities Services Premier House, Tollgate, Eastleigh, Hampshire SO53 3YE tel: 023 8064 8032 fax: 08000664304 http://www.emcoruk.com/ This message is for the named person's use only. It may contain confidential, proprietary or legally privileged information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission. If you receive this message in error, please immediately delete it and all copies of it from your system, destroy any hard copies of it and notify the sender. You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute, print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended recipient. From mathew.ducket1@btopenworld.com Thu Aug 16 21:19:52 2007 From: mathew.ducket1@btopenworld.com (Mathew Duckett) Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 21:19:52 +0100 Subject: [WED]Duckett/ Banwell Message-ID: <000201c7e048$85c202a0$58097ad5@duckett> This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0025_01C7E04B.2F71BAA0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Firstly a big appology to all for my major and uncorrected error in = Blackford and Round About. Eleanor Green born 1826 was the daughter of = Thomas Green and Elizabeth nee Wall. Not William Green as printed. This = error sliped through the proof reading twice. Some of the material below has been duplicated by Olga, but it is still = not proving very easy to connect Eleanor and Elizabeth as sisters. I = think the term must have be used loosely. Elizabeth Banwell was born in 1857, only daughter of Henry and Elizabeth = Banwell of Batcome Farm, Nyland (nr Cheddar). Her mother was 48 when she = was born, there were no children in 1851. By 1881 she is living in the = same farm but now her husband Edward Arney (born Weare 1854) is the head = of the household. There are two children. The only connection I can make with Eleanor Duckett (Green) is as = follows. Eleanor's husband Robert had a younger sister Dorcas. In 1844 = Dorcas married John Arney of Weare, Dorcas died in 1845, her only = daughter in 1846. I presume that Edward Arney is a son of John by a = second marriage. A bit of a thin connection to use the term sister, also = a big age difference. My information on the death of Elizabeth Green nee Wall in 1826 comes = from a Green family tree, I have not yet corroborated it from the Theale = Parish Records. I had assumed that William Green born 1829/30 was the = child of a second marriage. This clearly needs clarifying. I also note that Elizabeth Banwell senior was born a Green but I can't = find her on the Green family tree. If anyone has any information on Batcombe Farm, Batcombe cum Nyland, = especially from 1600 to 1800 I would welcome it for other reasons. Matthew. ------=_NextPart_000_0025_01C7E04B.2F71BAA0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Firstly a big appology to all for my = major and=20 uncorrected error in Blackford and Round About. Eleanor Green born 1826 = was the=20 daughter of Thomas Green and Elizabeth nee Wall. Not William Green as = printed.=20 This error sliped through the proof reading twice.

Some of the material below has been = duplicated by=20 Olga, but it is still not proving very easy to connect Eleanor and=20 Elizabeth as sisters. I think the term must have be used = loosely.

Elizabeth Banwell was born in 1857, = only daughter=20 of Henry and Elizabeth Banwell of Batcome Farm, Nyland (nr Cheddar). Her = mother=20 was 48 when she was born, there were no children in 1851. By 1881 = she is=20 living in the same farm but now her husband Edward Arney (born Weare = 1854) is=20 the head of the household. There are two children.

The only connection I can make with = Eleanor Duckett=20 (Green) is as follows. Eleanor's husband Robert had a younger = sister=20 Dorcas. In 1844 Dorcas married John Arney of Weare, Dorcas died in 1845, = her=20 only daughter in 1846. I presume that Edward Arney is a son of John by a = second=20 marriage. A bit of a thin connection to use the term sister, = also a=20 big age difference.

My information on the death of = Elizabeth Green nee=20 Wall in 1826 comes from a Green family tree, I have not = yet corroborated it=20 from the Theale Parish Records. I had assumed that William Green born = 1829/30=20 was the child of a second marriage. This clearly needs = clarifying.

I also note that Elizabeth Banwell = senior was born=20 a Green but I can't find her on the Green family tree.

If anyone has any information on = Batcombe Farm,=20 Batcombe cum Nyland, especially from 1600 to 1800 I would welcome it for = other=20 reasons.

Matthew.

------=_NextPart_000_0025_01C7E04B.2F71BAA0-- From lnunn@bigpond.net.au Sat Aug 18 06:07:49 2007 From: lnunn@bigpond.net.au (Lyn Nunn) Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2007 15:07:49 +1000 Subject: [WED]COUNSELL, MOBBS, STOTT Message-ID: <00bf01c7e155$b97e9960$2e37ae3a@enterpriseb> This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_00BC_01C7E1A9.8AE31910 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable >From Somerset Wills at Exeter Vol LXII=20 Ed. S.W. Rawlins & I. Fitzroy Jones, Butler & Tanner, Frome, 1952 p. 138 Richard COUNSELL Lympsham, Nov 2, 1585 no date of proof. =20 To the church at Lympsham 2d; to the Church at Wedmore 2d; eldest son = George, younger son John, brother Richard (?), wife Dorothy executrix. = Overseers John COUNSELL, Robert STOTT. Witnesses Robert MOBBS, William = GOERNEY. Contributed by D.R. COUNSELL. Lyn Nunn Brisbane Australia ------=_NextPart_000_00BC_01C7E1A9.8AE31910 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

From=20 Somerset Wills at Exeter Vol LXII=20

Ed. S.W. Rawlins & I. Fitzroy Jones, Butler & Tanner, Frome,=20 1952

p. 138 Richard = COUNSELL Lympsham,=20 Nov 2, 1585 no date of proof.

To the church at = Lympsham 2d; to=20 the Church at Wedmore 2d; eldest son George, younger son John, brother = Richard=20 (?), wife Dorothy executrix. Overseers John COUNSELL, Robert STOTT. = Witnesses=20 Robert MOBBS, William GOERNEY.

Contributed by D.R. = COUNSELL.

Lyn=20 Nunn
Brisbane
Australia

------=_NextPart_000_00BC_01C7E1A9.8AE31910-- From lnunn@bigpond.net.au Sat Aug 18 06:09:17 2007 From: lnunn@bigpond.net.au (Lyn Nunn) Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2007 15:09:17 +1000 Subject: [WED]HOLBROOK, DUCKETT, FISHER, PURNELL, ATHEALE Message-ID: <00c601c7e155$ed766ea0$2e37ae3a@enterpriseb> This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_00C3_01C7E1A9.BF05CEE0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable >From Somerset Wills at Exeter Vol LXII=20 Ed. S.W. Rawlins & I. Fitzroy Jones, Butler & Tanner, Frome, 1952 p. 100 John HOLBROOK of Sutton Weekes in Chew psh; husb. Date 3 Sept = 1568. =20 To be bur. In chyd. of Chew Magna. To St And. Ch. Of Wells, 3d. To poor = men's box 5s. To relief of poor in same psh. 5s. to be distributed at = discretion of wife Joan and son Henry. To bro. in law Thomas DUCKETT 3 = wether lambs. To son in law John FFISHER a red yearling. Res. To wife = Joan sole executrix; but if she should die intestate then all goods = between sons John, Thomas and Roger at discretion of William ATHEALE and = John PURNELL the elder. Witnesses John PURNELL, the elder, Henry = HOLBROOK and Henry ATHEALE. Proved 13 June 1569 at Chew. Inventory = =A343.5s.4d. Lyn Nunn Brisbane Australia ------=_NextPart_000_00C3_01C7E1A9.BF05CEE0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

From Somerset Wills at Exeter Vol LXII =

Ed. S.W. Rawlins & I. Fitzroy Jones, Butler & Tanner, Frome,=20 1952

p. 100 John HOLBROOK of Sutton Weekes in Chew psh; husb. = Date 3=20 Sept 1568.

To be bur. In chyd. of Chew Magna. To St = And. Ch. Of Wells, 3d. To poor = men=92s box=20 5s. To relief of poor in same psh. 5s. to be distributed at discretion = of wife=20 Joan and son Henry. To bro. in law Thomas DUCKETT 3 wether lambs. To son = in law=20 John FFISHER a red yearling. Res. To wife Joan sole executrix; but if = she should=20 die intestate then all goods between sons John, Thomas and Roger at = discretion=20 of William ATHEALE and John PURNELL the elder. Witnesses John PURNELL, = the=20 elder, Henry HOLBROOK and Henry ATHEALE. Proved 13 June 1569 at Chew. = Inventory=20 =A343.5s.4d.

Lyn=20 Nunn
Brisbane
Australia

------=_NextPart_000_00C3_01C7E1A9.BF05CEE0-- From mathew.ducket1@btopenworld.com Sat Aug 18 18:05:57 2007 From: mathew.ducket1@btopenworld.com (Mathew Duckett) Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2007 18:05:57 +0100 Subject: [WED]Re: Eliza Banwell & Eleanor Duckett References: <002801c7daf1$8ce156a0$0301a8c0@D1JXJ81S> Message-ID: <000301c7e1ba$5d326960$9b418351@duckett> This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0036_01C7E1C2.6D15D1C0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dear Rosalind, your note caught my attention. I can't say that Banwells, = Taylors or Hills feature in my index but I do have some Reeves.=20 I have a copy of a will for Thomas Duckett of Batcombe dated 1642/43.=20 In brief,=20 (Item) 5 To my sister Alice Reeve Two Five Sheep. (Item) 6 To my sister Elizabeth Reeve Two Five Sheep. (Item) 10 Unto my Brothers Thomas and William Reeve One Five Sheep = apiece. (Item) 11 All residue etc to Marie Duckett my Wife and I do appoint her = to be my Executrix. (Item) 12 I appoint to be my overseers of this my last will and = testament William Reeve, my father in law and Donald Comer and give them = four shillings apiece. I have only listed the Reeve items. The will was transcribed by the late = Eric Banwell in 1998 and credit is due to him. He states that the = transcription is loose and that the spelling of Reeve is variable. He = also suggests that the sisters and brothers could be in laws. I think it = is true of the brothers, but the sisters might be actual. Batcombe is the same farm as has come up in the Duckett/ Banwell = correspondence. This is probably a coincidence. Batcombe cum Nyland is an oddity. It is a area of land between Cheddar = and Draycott / Rodney Stoke. One farm in Batcombe, perhaps five in = Nyland probably a few cottages as well. Batcombe Farm was historically a = Priory administered by Glastonbury Abbey, after the reformation it would = have been sold off. The area was still administered by Glastonbury = (presumably St. John's parish) until as late as 1900. The inhabitants = used Cheddar Church but the records are not comprehensive (there is a = shortage of Duckett burials compared with marriages and baptisms). = Rodney Stoke Church is as close as Cheddar. Also Wedmore marriages, 25 1 1710 Edward Duckett and Elizabeth Taylor. 11 2 1769 William Reeve and Mary Duckett.=20 Mary was a widow by the name of Nuttycomb, she married Edward Duckett on = 27 1 1760 in Wedmore. I understand her maiden name was Wall. Robert = Nutticombe married Mary Wall on 1 2 1759 in Wedmore. He died on 7 9 1759 = in Wedmore. Fast work! Matthew ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Rosalind Torrent=20 To: Mathew Duckett ; Lyn Nunn=20 Sent: Friday, August 10, 2007 2:55 AM Subject: Eliza Banwell & Eleanor Duckett Dear Mathew and Lyn, Tim Curtin forwarded information to me about your entry on the Wedmore = lists regarding a Bible and Eliza Banwell and Eleanor Duckett. Whilst I = probably cannot be of much assistance with that line of enquiry, I = thought it might be useful to mention the connection I might have with = the Banwells, Ducketts and other families from Rodney Stoke, Draycott = and surrounds. My ancestors were essentially Reeves, Hill and Taylor and = amongst my research I have come across marriages with Ducketts and = Banwells. I have just got a couple of Grimsteed wills which mention = Henry Banwell of Nyland. I am happy to share more details of my research = with you if you see a possible connection to your enquiry. I would also like to mention that I am happy to communicate with = anyone who might have an enquiry about anyone who passed through the = doors of St Leonard's, Rodney Stoke (alive or dead) or who lived in = Draycott. I seem to be able to find a connection with just about = everybody.=20 Ros Torrent ------=_NextPart_000_0036_01C7E1C2.6D15D1C0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Dear Rosalind, your note caught my = attention. I=20 can't say that Banwells, Taylors or Hills feature in my index but I do = have some=20 Reeves.

I have a copy of a will for Thomas = Duckett of=20 Batcombe dated 1642/43.

In brief,

(Item) 5 To my sister Alice Reeve Two = Five=20 Sheep.

(Item) 6 To my sister Elizabeth Reeve = Two Five=20 Sheep.

(Item) 10 Unto my Brothers Thomas and = William Reeve=20 One Five Sheep apiece.

(Item) 11 All residue etc to Marie = Duckett my Wife=20 and I do appoint her to be my Executrix.

(Item) 12 I appoint to be my overseers = of this my=20 last will and testament William Reeve, my father in law and Donald Comer = and=20 give them four shillings apiece.

I have only listed the Reeve items. The = will was=20 transcribed by the late Eric Banwell in 1998 and credit is due to him. = He states=20 that the transcription is loose and that the spelling of Reeve is = variable. He=20 also suggests that the sisters and brothers could be in laws. I think it = is true=20 of the brothers, but the sisters might be actual.

Batcombe is the same farm as has come = up in the=20 Duckett/ Banwell correspondence. This is probably a = coincidence.

Batcombe cum Nyland is an oddity. It is = a area of=20 land between Cheddar and Draycott / Rodney Stoke. One farm in = Batcombe,=20 perhaps five in Nyland probably a few cottages as well. Batcombe Farm = was=20 historically a Priory administered by Glastonbury Abbey, after the = reformation=20 it would have been sold off. The area was still administered by =20 Glastonbury (presumably St. John's parish) until as late as 1900. The=20 inhabitants used Cheddar Church but the records are not comprehensive = (there is=20 a shortage of Duckett burials compared with marriages and baptisms). = Rodney=20 Stoke Church is as close as Cheddar.

Also Wedmore marriages,

25 1 1710 Edward Duckett and = Elizabeth=20 Taylor.

11 2 1769 William Reeve and Mary = Duckett.=20

Mary was a widow by the name of = Nuttycomb, she=20 married Edward Duckett on 27 1 1760 in Wedmore. I understand her maiden = name was=20 Wall. Robert Nutticombe married Mary Wall on 1 2 1759 in Wedmore. He = died on 7 9=20 1759 in Wedmore. Fast work!

Matthew

----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Rosalind Torrent =
To: Mathew Duckett ; Lyn = Nunn=20

Sent: Friday, August 10, 2007 = 2:55=20 AM

Subject: Eliza Banwell & = Eleanor=20 Duckett

Dear Mathew and=20 Lyn,

Tim = Curtin forwarded=20 information to me about your entry on the Wedmore lists regarding a = Bible and=20 Eliza Banwell and Eleanor Duckett. Whilst I probably cannot be of much = assistance with that line of enquiry, I thought it might be useful to = mention=20 the connection I might have with the Banwells, Ducketts and other = families=20 from Rodney Stoke, Draycott and surrounds. My ancestors were = essentially=20 Reeves, Hill and Taylor and amongst my research I have come across = marriages=20 with Ducketts and Banwells. I have just got a couple of Grimsteed = wills which=20 mention Henry Banwell of Nyland. I am happy to share more details of = my=20 research with you if you see a possible connection to your=20 enquiry.

I would also like to = mention that=20 I am happy to communicate with anyone who might have an enquiry about = anyone=20 who passed through the doors of St = Leonard=92s, Rodney=20 Stoke (alive or dead) or who lived in Draycott. I seem to be able to = find a=20 connection with just about everybody.

Ros = Torrent

------=_NextPart_000_0036_01C7E1C2.6D15D1C0-- From omfraser@iprimus.com.au Sun Aug 19 10:25:13 2007 From: omfraser@iprimus.com.au (olga fraser) Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2007 19:25:13 +1000 Subject: [WED]help Message-ID: <001601c7e242$d91d8d60$a900a8c0@homegmr9djuo2u> This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0013_01C7E296.AA8652D0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Would anyone know the surname of the first wife of John Grimstead, Sarah = born about 1780. They lived at Chapel Farm in Nyland and after the death = of Sarah in 1843 John remarried the widow of John Banwell, Jemima who = lived next door at Batcombe Farm in Nyland with her husband John until = his death. Thanks Olga ------=_NextPart_000_0013_01C7E296.AA8652D0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Would anyone know the surname of the = first wife of=20 John Grimstead, Sarah born about 1780. They lived at Chapel Farm in = Nyland and=20 after the death of Sarah in 1843 John remarried the widow of John = Banwell,=20 Jemima who lived next door at Batcombe Farm in Nyland with her husband = John=20 until his death.

Thanks=20 Olga

------=_NextPart_000_0013_01C7E296.AA8652D0-- From mathew.ducket1@btopenworld.com Sun Aug 19 14:30:53 2007 From: mathew.ducket1@btopenworld.com (Mathew Duckett) Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2007 14:30:53 +0100 Subject: [WED]Re: Eliza Banwell & Eleanor Duckett References: <002801c7daf1$8ce156a0$0301a8c0@D1JXJ81S> <000301c7e1ba$5d326960$9b418351@duckett> <007a01c7e1ea$ca3b76c0$ca34ae3a@enterpriseb> Message-ID: <000201c7e268$92895b60$d4108351@duckett> This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0027_01C7E26D.8C207B00 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dear Lyn, I doubt if you will get to far with this idea. Obviously there were = social barriers in the Wedmore area but most of the land was = historically owned by the church or the crown. As a result there was no = large land owner. The "Lords of the Manors" were well off but not very = wealthy and freely married into the more educated farming families. The = middle ranking farming families would have married in either direction = up to the "yeoman" farmers and down to the "more respectable" of the = farm labourers. The absence of Banwells in the Duckett records is I = think coincidence, both families and the Tincknells were well = represented in the upper and middle ranking farming families and would = have regarded each other as equals. That is not to say that there were = no representatives of these families amongst the farm labourers. The = sons of George Duckett of Theale 1738-1825 are a good example. His = second son William appears to have been a very successful farmer yet the = youngest son John ended in the workhouse. Elisha and Joseph were clearly = poor men; James, George and Edward perhaps somewhere in between. As far = as I can see the descendants of Joseph 1734-1822 who was George snr. = brother were all relatively secure.=20 Many people married amongst their neighbours and relatives (second = cousins and cousins by marriage). I am sure that brother / sister in law = marriages were quite common. Religion was an impediment, a lot of = tradesmen were non conformists (Methodists and Baptists), many farmers = would have regarded marriage to "trade" as worse than marriage to the = labouring classes. I think geography was the single most important = factor in this area. Don't let me stop you it might prove interesting. I have never heard of = anything like a family feud in Wedmore but you never know. Matthew ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Lyn Nunn=20 To: Mathew Duckett=20 Sent: Saturday, August 18, 2007 11:54 PM Subject: Re: [WED]Re: Eliza Banwell & Eleanor Duckett Hi again Matthew. Your comment about there being no Banwells etc in = your tree made me smile. I have a school friend who is a Banwell but = from the Gloucestershire line. When I started researching and found = Banwells in Wedmore we wondered if we were related. However I could not = help but notice that in the 500 odd years the Tincknells were in Wedmore = they never once married a Banwell. They seemed to continually marry into = most Wedmore names except a few, one being Banwell. I wondered if there = was some sort of curious division in the community. I think though it is = most likely co-incidence and the fact that I particularly looked for = Tincknell/Banwell marriages, even in an indirect way. One day when I am = extremely bored I might sit down and extract social information like = that. :) From memory, a Tincknell married a Cicely Reeve, so I have Reeves too. regards Lyn ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Mathew Duckett=20 To: Rosalind Torrent=20 Cc: Wedmore lists=20 Sent: Sunday, August 19, 2007 3:05 AM Subject: [WED]Re: Eliza Banwell & Eleanor Duckett Dear Rosalind, your note caught my attention. I can't say that = Banwells, Taylors or Hills feature in my index but I do have some = Reeves.=20 I have a copy of a will for Thomas Duckett of Batcombe dated = 1642/43.=20 In brief,=20 (Item) 5 To my sister Alice Reeve Two Five Sheep. (Item) 6 To my sister Elizabeth Reeve Two Five Sheep. (Item) 10 Unto my Brothers Thomas and William Reeve One Five Sheep = apiece. (Item) 11 All residue etc to Marie Duckett my Wife and I do appoint = her to be my Executrix. (Item) 12 I appoint to be my overseers of this my last will and = testament William Reeve, my father in law and Donald Comer and give them = four shillings apiece. I have only listed the Reeve items. The will was transcribed by the = late Eric Banwell in 1998 and credit is due to him. He states that the = transcription is loose and that the spelling of Reeve is variable. He = also suggests that the sisters and brothers could be in laws. I think it = is true of the brothers, but the sisters might be actual. Batcombe is the same farm as has come up in the Duckett/ Banwell = correspondence. This is probably a coincidence. Batcombe cum Nyland is an oddity. It is a area of land between = Cheddar and Draycott / Rodney Stoke. One farm in Batcombe, perhaps five = in Nyland probably a few cottages as well. Batcombe Farm was = historically a Priory administered by Glastonbury Abbey, after the = reformation it would have been sold off. The area was still administered = by Glastonbury (presumably St. John's parish) until as late as 1900. = The inhabitants used Cheddar Church but the records are not = comprehensive (there is a shortage of Duckett burials compared with = marriages and baptisms). Rodney Stoke Church is as close as Cheddar. Also Wedmore marriages, 25 1 1710 Edward Duckett and Elizabeth Taylor. 11 2 1769 William Reeve and Mary Duckett.=20 Mary was a widow by the name of Nuttycomb, she married Edward = Duckett on 27 1 1760 in Wedmore. I understand her maiden name was Wall. = Robert Nutticombe married Mary Wall on 1 2 1759 in Wedmore. He died on 7 = 9 1759 in Wedmore. Fast work! Matthew ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Rosalind Torrent=20 To: Mathew Duckett ; Lyn Nunn=20 Sent: Friday, August 10, 2007 2:55 AM Subject: Eliza Banwell & Eleanor Duckett Dear Mathew and Lyn, Tim Curtin forwarded information to me about your entry on the = Wedmore lists regarding a Bible and Eliza Banwell and Eleanor Duckett. = Whilst I probably cannot be of much assistance with that line of = enquiry, I thought it might be useful to mention the connection I might = have with the Banwells, Ducketts and other families from Rodney Stoke, = Draycott and surrounds. My ancestors were essentially Reeves, Hill and = Taylor and amongst my research I have come across marriages with = Ducketts and Banwells. I have just got a couple of Grimsteed wills which = mention Henry Banwell of Nyland. I am happy to share more details of my = research with you if you see a possible connection to your enquiry. I would also like to mention that I am happy to communicate with = anyone who might have an enquiry about anyone who passed through the = doors of St Leonard's, Rodney Stoke (alive or dead) or who lived in = Draycott. I seem to be able to find a connection with just about = everybody.=20 Ros Torrent ------=_NextPart_000_0027_01C7E26D.8C207B00 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Dear Lyn,

I doubt if you will get to far with = this idea.=20 Obviously there were social barriers in the Wedmore area but most of the = land=20 was historically owned by the church or the crown. As a result there was = no=20 large land owner. The "Lords of the Manors" were well off but not very = wealthy=20 and freely married into the more educated farming families. The middle = ranking=20 farming families would have married in either direction up to the = "yeoman"=20 farmers and down to the "more respectable" of the farm labourers. The = absence of=20 Banwells in the Duckett records is I think coincidence, both families = and the=20 Tincknells were well represented in the upper and middle ranking farming = families and would have regarded each other as equals. That is not to = say that=20 there were no representatives of these families amongst the farm = labourers. The=20 sons of George Duckett of Theale 1738-1825 are a good example. His = second son=20 William appears to have been a very successful farmer yet the youngest = son John=20 ended in the workhouse. Elisha and Joseph were clearly poor men; James, = George=20 and Edward perhaps somewhere in between. As far as I can see the = descendants of=20 Joseph 1734-1822 who was George snr. brother were all relatively secure. =

Many people married amongst their = neighbours and=20 relatives (second cousins and cousins by marriage). I am sure that = brother /=20 sister in law marriages were quite common. Religion was an impediment, a = lot of=20 tradesmen were non conformists (Methodists and Baptists), many farmers = would=20 have regarded marriage to "trade" as worse than marriage to the = labouring=20 classes. I think geography was the single most important factor in this=20 area.

Don't let me stop you it might prove = interesting. I=20 have never heard of anything like a family feud in Wedmore but you never = know.

Matthew

----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Lyn Nunn=20
To: Mathew Duckett =

Sent: Saturday, August 18, 2007 = 11:54=20 PM

Subject: Re: [WED]Re: Eliza = Banwell &=20 Eleanor Duckett

Hi = again Matthew.=20 Your comment about there being no Banwells etc in your tree made me = smile. I=20 have a school friend who is a Banwell but from the Gloucestershire = line. When=20 I started researching and found Banwells in Wedmore we wondered if we = were=20 related. However I could not help but notice that in the 500 odd years = the=20 Tincknells were in Wedmore they never once married a Banwell. They = seemed to=20 continually marry into most Wedmore names except a few, one being = Banwell. I=20 wondered if there was some sort of curious division in the community. = I think=20 though it is most likely co-incidence and the fact that I particularly = looked=20 for Tincknell/Banwell marriages, even in an indirect way. One day when = I am=20 extremely bored I might sit down and extract social information like = that.=20 :)

From = memory, a=20 Tincknell married a Cicely Reeve, so I have Reeves=20 too.

regards

Lyn

----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Mathew Duckett =
To: Rosalind Torrent =

Cc: Wedmore lists

Sent: Sunday, August 19, 2007 = 3:05=20 AM

Subject: [WED]Re: Eliza = Banwell &=20 Eleanor Duckett

Dear Rosalind, your note caught my = attention. I=20 can't say that Banwells, Taylors or Hills feature in my index but I = do have=20 some Reeves.

I have a copy of a will for Thomas = Duckett of=20 Batcombe dated 1642/43.

In brief,

(Item) 5 To my sister Alice Reeve = Two Five=20 Sheep.

(Item) 6 To my sister Elizabeth = Reeve Two Five=20 Sheep.

(Item) 10 Unto my Brothers Thomas = and William=20 Reeve One Five Sheep apiece.

(Item) 11 All residue etc to Marie = Duckett my=20 Wife and I do appoint her to be my Executrix.

(Item) 12 I appoint to be my = overseers of this=20 my last will and testament William Reeve, my father in law and = Donald Comer=20 and give them four shillings apiece.

I have only listed the Reeve items. = The will=20 was transcribed by the late Eric Banwell in 1998 and credit is due = to him.=20 He states that the transcription is loose and that the spelling of = Reeve is=20 variable. He also suggests that the sisters and brothers could be in = laws. I=20 think it is true of the brothers, but the sisters might be=20 actual.

Batcombe is the same farm as has = come up in the=20 Duckett/ Banwell correspondence. This is probably a=20 coincidence.

Batcombe cum Nyland is an oddity. = It is a area=20 of land between Cheddar and Draycott / Rodney Stoke. One farm = in=20 Batcombe, perhaps five in Nyland probably a few cottages as well. = Batcombe=20 Farm was historically a Priory administered by Glastonbury Abbey, = after the=20 reformation it would have been sold off. The area was still = administered=20 by Glastonbury (presumably St. John's parish) until as late as = 1900.=20 The inhabitants used Cheddar Church but the records are not = comprehensive=20 (there is a shortage of Duckett burials compared with marriages and=20 baptisms). Rodney Stoke Church is as close as Cheddar.

Also Wedmore = marriages,

25 1 1710 Edward Duckett and = Elizabeth=20 Taylor.

11 2 1769 William Reeve and Mary = Duckett.=20

Mary was a widow by the name of = Nuttycomb, she=20 married Edward Duckett on 27 1 1760 in Wedmore. I understand her = maiden name=20 was Wall. Robert Nutticombe married Mary Wall on 1 2 1759 in = Wedmore. He=20 died on 7 9 1759 in Wedmore. Fast work!

Matthew

----- Original Message ----- =
From:=20 Rosalind Torrent =
To: Mathew Duckett = ; Lyn Nunn=20

Sent: Friday, August 10, = 2007 2:55=20 AM

Subject: Eliza Banwell = & Eleanor=20 Duckett

Dear Mathew and=20 Lyn,

Tim = Curtin=20 forwarded information to me about your entry on the Wedmore lists=20 regarding a Bible and Eliza Banwell and Eleanor Duckett. Whilst I = probably=20 cannot be of much assistance with that line of enquiry, I thought = it might=20 be useful to mention the connection I might have with the = Banwells,=20 Ducketts and other families from Rodney Stoke, Draycott and = surrounds. My=20 ancestors were essentially Reeves, Hill and Taylor and amongst my = research=20 I have come across marriages with Ducketts and Banwells. I have = just got a=20 couple of Grimsteed wills which mention Henry Banwell of Nyland. I = am=20 happy to share more details of my research with you if you see a = possible=20 connection to your enquiry.

I would also like to = mention=20 that I am happy to communicate with anyone who might have an = enquiry about=20 anyone who passed through the doors of St=20 Leonard=92s, Rodney Stoke = (alive or=20 dead) or who lived in Draycott. I seem to be able to find a = connection=20 with just about everybody.

Ros = Torrent

------=_NextPart_000_0027_01C7E26D.8C207B00-- From thewilliamsfour@juno.com Mon Aug 20 17:39:26 2007 From: thewilliamsfour@juno.com (Williams) Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 16:39:26 GMT Subject: [WED]looking for my Tuttons Message-ID: <20070820.103926.13805.0@webmail25.lax.untd.com> Greetings I am looking for my Tuttons George Tutton was born 1829 on the= Isle of Guernsey he was the son of George Tutton Sr and Elizabeth Bryan= t George Sr was born in Wedmore in 1792. That is as far back as I can g= et them. Thanks in advance Robert Williams thewilliamsfour@juno.com From maureen@cloverbates.com Tue Aug 21 08:16:44 2007 From: maureen@cloverbates.com (maureen@cloverbates.com) Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 08:16:44 +0100 Subject: [WED]Please add message to List Message-ID: <000901c7e3c3$3f1a13f0$0502a8c0@scenic> This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0006_01C7E3CB.9C76DC10 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable To Rosalind Torrent. Hello Again Ros, I am still stuck at James Grimsteed b: 1755 in Cheddar, m: to Hannah = Card, do you have any info on James's parents ? also George Grimsteed = b:1790 at Lower Nyland Farm, m: to Hester ? I would like to get Hester's = surname if possible. I also have names that many of my Grimsteed family have married into, = Cook's from Wrington. Vowles, Lancaster, Henbrury and a few others. Best Wishes Maureen Bates. ------=_NextPart_000_0006_01C7E3CB.9C76DC10 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
To Rosalind = Torrent.

Hello Again Ros,

I am still stuck at James = Grimsteed b:=20 1755 in Cheddar, m: to Hannah Card, do you have any info on James's = parents=20 ? also George Grimsteed b:1790 at Lower Nyland Farm, m: to = Hester ?=20 I would like to get Hester's surname if possible.

I also have names that many of = my=20 Grimsteed family have married into, Cook's from Wrington. Vowles,=20 Lancaster, Henbrury and a few others.

Best Wishes

Maureen Bates.

------=_NextPart_000_0006_01C7E3CB.9C76DC10-- From pat@pathase.demon.co.uk Tue Aug 21 10:15:34 2007 From: pat@pathase.demon.co.uk (Pat Hase) Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 10:15:34 +0100 Subject: [WED]Elizabeth CARD married 1758 in Wedmore References: <000901c7e3c3$3f1a13f0$0502a8c0@scenic> Message-ID: <001801c7e3d3$d5ae4100$5c0c313e@pat42c5fv46c6m> The marriage of Elizabeth CARD to Jeremiah VENN took place in Wedmore 23 Oct 1758. I believe she died in July 1801 but I've not been able to find anything about Elizabeth CARD before her marriage - can anyone help? Thanks Pat From susan@avalon1999.fsnet.co.uk Tue Aug 21 22:31:02 2007 From: susan@avalon1999.fsnet.co.uk (Susan Hembury-Kellow) Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 22:31:02 +0100 Subject: [WED]Elizabeth CARD married 1758 in Wedmore In-Reply-To: <001801c7e3d3$d5ae4100$5c0c313e@pat42c5fv46c6m> Message-ID: <20070821213125.15C7C5800083@mwinf3112.me.freeserve.com> Hello Pat, Elizabeth CARD and Jeremiah VEN were my 5G Grandparents. Unfortunately, I'm also "stuck" for earlier CARD details, but the marriage info that I have shows that Jeremiah Ven, Minor, and Elizabeth Card, Minor, were married on 23 Oct 1758 at Wedmore; Witnesses - John STONE and William NORMAN. From this, I would assume that Elizabeth was born sometime after 1737. Someone (can't recall who - it was back in the old days, when I was stupid and didn't keep a note of sources!) once suggested that Elizabeth may have been from Mark, but I haven't yet found any info to support this. My VEN line of descent from Jeremiah and Elizabeth onwards is Jeremiah VEN, bap 11 Feb 1739, Wedmore; buried 22 Nov 1808, Wedmore; married Elizabeth CARD, 23 Oct 1758, Wedmore | Hannah VENN, bap 15 Feb 1773, Wedmore; buried 2 Feb 1848, Wedmore; married William ROGERS, 13 Oct 1794, Wedmore | Elizabeth "Betsy" ROGERS, bap 8 Feb 1809, Wedmore; buried 30 June 1893, Wedmore; married Isaac HEMBURY, 29 May 1832, Wedmore | William HEMBURY, bap 2 Jan 1834, Wedmore; died 31 March 1893, Wedmore; cause of death: "Hung himself during a state of temporary insanity"; Occupation: Agricultural Labourer; married Elizabeth WRIDE, 20 May 1857, Wedmore | Edward HEMBURY, bap 22 July 1870, Wedmore; died 1915, Taunton, Somerset; Occupation: County Police Constable, latterly Shopkeeper; married Lucy MEACHAM, 13 Dec 1899, Corfe, Somerset | Edward John HEMBURY, born 15 July 1902, 18, Avondale Road, Lower Weston, Bath, Somerset; died 17 Nov 1983, Taunton; Occupation: Engineer; married Violet Rhoda SAFFIN, 1 Aug 1927, St Mary Magdalen, Taunton. Edward John HEMBURY and Violet Rhoda SAFFIN were my maternal grandparents. Best wishes, Sue -----Original Message----- From: wedmore-admin@lists.tutton.org [mailto:wedmore-admin@lists.tutton.org] On Behalf Of Pat Hase Sent: 21 August 2007 10:16 To: wedmore@lists.tutton.org Subject: [WED]Elizabeth CARD married 1758 in Wedmore The marriage of Elizabeth CARD to Jeremiah VENN took place in Wedmore 23 Oct 1758. I believe she died in July 1801 but I've not been able to find anything about Elizabeth CARD before her marriage - can anyone help? Thanks Pat _______________________________________________ Wedmore mailing list Wedmore@lists.tutton.org http://lists.tutton.org/mailman/listinfo/wedmore Wedmore Web Site at: http://www.tutton.org